Nowhere In The Constitution Does It Say Armed Rebellion Is Okay

confederate

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Militias were our military at the time because we, as a budding new nation, had a rather small army. We needed well regulated (trained) civilians to stand on the ready to fight in state-run militias. Not against the United States government, but FOR the United States government. The second amendment written shortly after the Revolutionary War which was won with George Washington’s Continental army, state militias, and the help of France. The “free state” is the United States of America that we fought for and won from England after declaring independence, waging war, and beginning a new nation. The right to bear arms has always been at the discretion of the government since the beginning.

The government wrote the 2nd Amendment. They wrote it in 1791 to keep slaves in check and provide back up for the army. Not to allow an uprising against itself, it was to protect itself. When you try to overthrow your government that is the exact definition of treason. We live in a free nation because it has been fought for and maintained by our government.

Yes, our armed services are indeed our government. You support the troops? You support our government.

Remember if you secede you are no longer granted the rights and privileges of being part of the United States, including but not limited to the 2nd Amendment. Remember that.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say armed rebellion is okay. There’s a reason the Union fought against Confederate troops during the Civil War. Rebellion was frowned upon. It is very clear in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, that Congress may call forth “the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.” The Second Amendment was written to further enforce this.

You do however have the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Colbert Puts Right-Wing Politicians, Media & NRA in Their Place Over Background Checks (VIDEO)

"Colbert" "guns" "NRA" "senate" "Bob" "Davis" "background" "checks"

Last night Stephen Colbert offered up a serving of “truthiness” during his “The Word” segment on his show ‘The Colbert Report‘.

Several right-wing politicians, media personalities, as well as the NRA have been pushing against universal background checks in order to purchase a firearm. They feel that their “freedom” to be able to own and purchase a firearm shouldn’t be restricted or made slightly more difficult (i.e. fill out some paperwork, show and ID) by anything or anyone.

Colbert mocked Rand Paul after Paul admitted seeing the Newtown parents made him sad saying, “Hey Newtown parents, stop making Rand Paul sad. He’s extremely sensitive to his own feelings.”

Then Colbert pushed the point that gun owners feel they are the real victims of gun violence. He quoted right-wing radio host Bob Davis who said, “I’m sorry that you suffered a tragedy, but you know what? Deal with it and don’t force me to lose my liberty which is a greater tragedy than your loss.” To which Colbert responded, “Yes, the parents of Newtown only lost their children, but Bob Davis might have to fill out some forms at a gun show. That’s a precious waste of time, time that could be spent yelling at people who lost their children.” Colbert even pointing out that he knows what Davis would yell at them: (below)

Colbert3

Colbert’s response? “Finally, someone with the courage to tell off these Newtown parents to their faces. (While hiding in a radio booth)” When a Newtown resident offered to fly Davis out to speak with them he hasn’t even had the courage to respond. He even went so far as to insinuate Davis is a sociopath.

Colbert went on to point out that quite a few senators who voted against background checks are suffering in the polls. He also pointed out that through these senators love for NRA lobbying money that they must be so unattached to anything (ie. human emotion and compassion) but keeping their jobs and keeping the NRA happy.

Kudos, Stephen! Well done.

 

Even Megyn Kelly of Fox News Questions Legitimacy of Wayne LaPierre’s Arguments (VIDEO)

"Megyn" "Kelly" "Wayne" "LaPierre" "Fox" "News" "gun" "control" "laws" "Connecticut"

via Fox News

After the passage of Connecticut’s new gun laws Megyn Kelly on Fox News had NRA Vice President Wayne LaPierre on her program to discuss the new laws.

The new laws ban magazines that hold more than 10 rounds and require  background checks on practically all privately sold guns.

LaPierre immediately went after the new laws saying, “law books thicker for law-abiding citizens.”

Kelly responded, “I appreciate that and you articulate your position well, but if I could circle you back … If there’s anything that has moved people in this country … it’s the Newtown tragedy… You hear the parents of those children killed … say 11 children had the chance to escape while [the shooter] reloaded … That is, to me, the most compelling argument … for this limitation on [ammunition].”

Then LaPierre ever so rehearsed and automatic replied, “My response is that the criminals are not going to have less, one round in the hand of someone who is going to do horror is too many.”

However Megyn Kelly interrupted saying, ”How do you know? How do you know, Wayne? Adam Lanza’s mother was a legal gun owner. And how do you know that his mother would not have obeyed the law and limited the magazine clip, and then Adam Lanza would have been limited to 10 rounds instead of 30.”

EXACTLY, MEGYN!! Thank you!

LaPierre then went rambling on about how the gun could’ve been reloaded quickly saying, “People that know guns know you can change magazine clips in a second.”

All I have to say to that is, then why the huff about limiting magazine capacity? If it COULD save a life or lives, isn’t it worth trying? And a second? Really?? I’d like to see you prove that. Change a magazine in one second flat, Wayne.

When even Fox News has to call you on your bullshit you know you should probably take look at what you are saying and the legitimacy of your argument.

 

video source

One Georgia Highschool Finally Decided To Embrace An Integrated Prom, Realized It’s 2013 (VIDEO)

"Georgia" "integrated" "prom" "segregrated"

Before you get too excited about Georgia stepping away from the 1960s, the students are raising their own funds and this integrated prom is being held separately from the school prom. The official school proms are still segregated.

Stephanie Sinnot, a student at Wilcox County High School in Rochelle, GA said “We’re embarrassed, it’s embarrassing, yeah it’s kind of embarrassing.” — To say the least.

The students decided to make an integrated prom this year because the elected prom king is a white young man, and the elected prom queen is black young woman. Both had to have their pictures taken separately for the yearbook instead of together. Seems to me the racism lives at the administrative level and not as much at the student level.

The school granted permission for the integrated prom if students choose to attend (how kind and modern), but will still be holding their segregated proms as well (never mind) and if a person of color arrives at the “whites only” prom they will be escorted off the premises. Homecoming is also said to be segregated.

Yeah, we are definitely living in a “post-racial society.” (sarcasm) 

Ugh… this is beyond disgusting. Really Georgia?… Really?!

video source

President Obama Giving Back 5% Of His Salary In Solidarity With Furloughed Workers

"Obama" "five" "percent" "Treasury" "salary"

President Obama knows how unfair the sequester cuts are to several public servants who work for the government. Many are being forced to take unpaid leave, otherwise known as furlough.

In solidarity with his fellow government employees he is giving back 5% of his salary to the Treasury, or roughly $20,000 of his $400,000 salary. Even though the end of the fiscal year ends in only a few months he is still giving the full $20K back, according to the Associated Press.

He can’t change his salary since that is determined by law, so this personal decision is quite admirable. He will accept his salary and then cut a check back to the Treasury.

 

x
Follow Political Shake